The Fountain

The Fountain (Widescreen Edition)This film should only be watched once.

As a second-time viewer, I knew approximately how it ended, and how the three epic stories tied together, but it wasn't pleasant to watch. It wasn't pleasant the first time, but at least the images were striking, and felt like some kind of voyage of discovery. Watching this again was a bit like watching The Sixth Sense for the fourth time. The impact had disappeared.

For most of the film, the camera moved toward those truly frustrating close-up, poser shots that so irritated me about Master and Commander. I understand that these are pretty people, and they earn the money, and so they get close-ups, but when it doesn't enhance the plot or the artistic composition as a whole - when it doesn't create unity, then it has no place. Actors should understand that, and have a serious heart-to-heart with their directors about it.

I usually enjoy watching Rachel Weisz, but in this film she seemed flat, passive, and enervated. To be fair, she was playing a tree dying of cancer, but I can't help thinking that the character written for her ultimately sabotaged the film as a complete work.

Comments

  1. BobApril 18, 2011 at 12:31 PM

    I thought Rachel Weisz was the only good thing about this pretentious mess. She and Hugh Jackman at least made you care about what they were going through and Weisz was just heartbreaking. I blame the script and the director for making this film incoherent with its narrative constantly jumping around time periods.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nancy RocheApril 28, 2011 at 9:58 PM

    Perhaps I am simply not the intended audience, but I maintain my opinion that although the story is innovative (I had little trouble following it, and in fact, found the storytelling rather impressive), the two main characters and how the camera treated them were the only real detractions from an otherwise forceful film. (painful, but certainly forceful)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Austen

Image
My co-worker warned me about Lost in Austen . She said it was cheesy, and from the few clips forced on me by a very fanatically-inclined little sister, I would have completely agreed. In context, though, I think it all sort of fit, although it's not exactly Emmy material. I really liked what they did to this story, but my reasoning is a bit complex. I have read Pride and Prejudice perhaps seven times. The only books I have read more often are Heart of Darkness (8) and The Book of Mormon (?). That doesn't mean that I like the work, just that my professors did. I admit, I liked the book very well the first three times. The romance was classic and endearing, and the language was fluid and fun. Then came Austenmania, and I jumped ship. Jane Austen wrote some enjoyable stories, but I wouldn't rank her any higher than Georgette Heyer (this coming from the same person who ranks Shakespeare with Steven Spielberg). And at this point, having seen every version of P&P ever fil
Read more

Salt

Image
This film had all the elements of a classic cold-war spy thriller in much the same way State of Play reprised journalism drama. Both Liev Schreiber and Angelina Jolie played very well, especially off each-other, and although this film must essentially showcase stunts and physical effects, the plot and ending work quite well too, without becoming too belabored or falling into too many cliche traps. Salt is ultimately exciting and fun, but don't try to wrangle a classic out of it.
Read more